Current:Home > MarketsFederal appeals court says there is no fundamental right to change one’s sex on a birth certificate -FutureFinance
Federal appeals court says there is no fundamental right to change one’s sex on a birth certificate
View
Date:2025-04-27 11:59:35
NASHVILLE, Tenn. (AP) — A federal appeals court panel ruled 2-1 on Friday that Tennessee does not unconstitutionally discriminate against transgender people by not allowing them to change the sex designation on their birth certificates.
“There is no fundamental right to a birth certificate recording gender identity instead of biological sex,” 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals Judge Jeffrey Sutton wrote for the majority in the decision upholding a 2023 district court ruling. The plaintiffs could not show that Tennessee’s policy was created out of animus against transgender people as it has been in place for more than half a century and “long predates medical diagnoses of gender dysphoria,” Sutton wrote.
He noted that “States’ practices are all over the map.” Some allow changes to the birth certificate with medical evidence of surgery. Others require lesser medical evidence. Only 11 states currently allow a change to a birth certificate based solely on a person’s declaration of their gender identity, which is what the plaintiffs are seeking in Tennessee.
Tennessee birth certificates reflect the sex assigned at birth, and that information is used for statistical and epidemiological activities that inform the provision of health services throughout the country, Sutton wrote. “How, it’s worth asking, could a government keep uniform records of any sort if the disparate views of its citizens about shifting norms in society controlled the government’s choices of language and of what information to collect?”
The plaintiffs — four transgender women born in Tennessee — argued in court filings that sex is properly determined not by external genitalia but by gender identity, which they define in their brief as “a person’s core internal sense of their own gender.” The lawsuit, first filed in federal court in Nashville in 2019, claims Tennessee’s prohibition serves no legitimate government interest while it subjects transgender people to discrimination, harassment and even violence when they have to produce a birth certificate for identification that clashes with their gender identity.
In a dissenting opinion, Judge Helene White agreed with the plaintiffs, represented by Lambda Legal.
“Forcing a transgender individual to use a birth certificate indicating sex assigned at birth causes others to question whether the individual is indeed the person stated on the birth certificate,” she wrote. “This inconsistency also invites harm and discrimination.”
Lambda Legal did not immediately respond to emails requesting comment on Friday.
Tennessee Attorney General Jonathan Skrmetti said in a statement that the question of changing the sex designation on a birth certificate should be left to the states.
“While other states have taken different approaches, for decades Tennessee has consistently recognized that a birth certificate records a biological fact of a child being male or female and has never addressed gender identity,” he said.
veryGood! (9)
Related
- See you latte: Starbucks plans to cut 30% of its menu
- The Bureau of Land Management Lets 1.5 Million Cattle Graze on Federal Land for Almost Nothing, but the Cost to the Climate Could Be High
- Jennifer Lawrence Sets the Record Straight on Liam Hemsworth, Miley Cyrus Cheating Rumors
- Northwestern athletics accused of fostering a toxic culture amid hazing scandal
- 2 killed, 3 injured in shooting at makeshift club in Houston
- A timeline of the Carlee Russell case: What happened to the Alabama woman who disappeared for 2 days?
- Shipping Looks to Hydrogen as It Seeks to Ditch Bunker Fuel
- Permafrost expert and military pilot among 4 killed in a helicopter crash on Alaska’s North Slope
- Will the 'Yellowstone' finale be the last episode? What we know about Season 6, spinoffs
- Got a question for Twitter's press team? The answer will be a poop emoji
Ranking
- Moving abroad can be expensive: These 5 countries will 'pay' you to move there
- Inside a bank run
- The Bachelorette Charity Lawson Explains Her Controversial First Impression Rose Decision
- Banks gone wild: SVB, Signature and moral hazard
- Civic engagement nonprofits say democracy needs support in between big elections. Do funders agree?
- After It Narrowed the EPA’s Authority, Talks of Expanding the Supreme Court Garner New Support
- Abortion messaging roils debate over Ohio ballot initiative. Backers said it wasn’t about that
- Planet Money Records Vol. 3: Making a hit
Recommendation
Retirement planning: 3 crucial moves everyone should make before 2025
Wife of Gilgo Beach murders suspect Rex Heuermann files for divorce as woman shares eerie encounter with him
UNEP Chief Inger Andersen Says it’s Easy to Forget all the Environmental Progress Made Over the Past 50 Years. Climate Change Is Another Matter
If You Want a Low-Maintenance Skincare Routine, Try This 1-Minute Facial While It’s 59% Off
What do we know about the mysterious drones reported flying over New Jersey?
What happens to the body in extreme heat? Experts explain the heat wave's dangerous impact.
Jack Daniel's tells Supreme Court its brand is harmed by dog toy Bad Spaniels
Shipping Looks to Hydrogen as It Seeks to Ditch Bunker Fuel
Like
- Gen. Mark Milley's security detail and security clearance revoked, Pentagon says
- Texas Politicians Aim to Penalize Wind and Solar in Response to Outages. Are Renewables Now Strong Enough to Defend Themselves?
- As Lake Powell Hits Landmark Low, Arizona Looks to a $1 Billion Investment and Mexican Seawater to Slake its Thirst